University students should pay the full cost of their studies because university education benefits individuals rather than society as a whole. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample answer for band 8 - showing full agreement
Introduction
In recent times, debates around university funding have intensified. Some argue that higher education should be free, while others believe that students must bear the entire cost of their studies. I fully agree that university students should pay the full amount because the main benefits of higher education are personal, not societal.
Body 1 – Benefits are Individual
University degrees primarily enhance an individual’s employment opportunities and income. For example, an engineering graduate in Gujarat can easily earn double the salary of a person with only a high school education. Since students directly enjoy higher salaries and better lifestyles, it is reasonable that they should fund their education rather than expect taxpayers to carry the burden.
Body 2 – Reduces Pressure on Government
Another strong reason is that governments in developing countries such as India already face financial constraints in healthcare, infrastructure, and rural development. If public funds are directed towards financing higher education for all, essential sectors may suffer. Thus, requiring students to pay ensures financial sustainability.
Body Passage 3 Concession (Strawman)
It is true that some argue universities contribute skilled professionals to society. However, society already provides opportunities through schools and basic education. At the tertiary level, the benefits largely shift to individuals, making personal payment more logical. (read the note below)
Conclusion
In conclusion, university students should be responsible for their own costs because the rewards of higher education are primarily personal, while governments must prioritize broader social needs.
Vishalsir's note:
Strawman in this essay:
In Body 3, the essay acknowledges the opposing view (universities benefit society by producing skilled professionals) but immediately refutes it (society already funds basic education; university benefits are mostly individual).
Why it’s necessary:
This technique shows balance, strengthens your stance, and demonstrates critical thinking—exactly what examiners look for in Band 8+ answers.
No comments:
Post a Comment